bootstrap1, iteration, reverse-complement and ring. There are a few regressions too; I've highlighted those in red and will be investigating them.| Benchmark | Run time (ms) |
|---|---|
| bootstrap1 | 11452 |
| bootstrap2 | 575675 |
| continuations | 389 |
| dispatch1 | 3660 |
| dispatch2 | 4399 |
| dispatch3 | 5167 |
| dispatch4 | 8892 |
| empty-loop | 496 |
| fib1 | 238 |
| fib2 | 907 |
| fib3 | 1438 |
| fib4 | 4962 |
| fib5 | 2015 |
| iteration | 13864 |
| mandel | 4806 |
| nsieve | 2428 |
| nsieve-bits | 69021 |
| partial-sums | 31281 |
| raytracer | 26893 |
| recursive | 45196 |
| reverse-complement | 12641 |
| ring | 8051 |
| sort | 2061 |
| spectral-norm | 35304 |
| typecheck1 | 5136 |
| typecheck2 | 5624 |
| typecheck3 | 5632 |
| typecheck4 | 4049 |
A year and a half ago, reverse-complement was clocking in at 170 seconds. It's 14 times faster now!
Is it time to add Factor to the Computer Language Shootout? You seem to have implemented the bulk of the benchmarks already.
ReplyDelete